AI Won’t Replace Lawyers—But It Could Undermine the Development of Legal Judgment?

AI is no longer a distant prospect. Automated contracts, due diligence completed in minutes, and AI-generated reports are now embedded in the daily operations of many law firms. Yet, as José María Alonso highlighted in a recent interview with us, this transformation presents a double-edged sword: 

“AI is becoming crucial for processing large volumes of information, such as 1,000-page briefs and thousands of documents. This multiplies productivity but presents a challenge for training young lawyers, who may rely too heavily on these tools without developing the critical skills to analyse complex documents independently. It’s a difficult balance.” 

The challenge, then, isn’t adopting AI—it’s using it without losing what makes a lawyer valuable: critical thinking and judgment. In this article, we look at how AI is impacting the legal sector, the risks it poses to training and judgement, and how firms can make practical use of it without compromising their core expertise. 

1. Risks to Legal Thinking, Quality, and Talent Development

Critical thinking: As routine tasks become automated, there’s a growing concern within the sector that junior lawyers are gaining less exposure to the complex, analytical work traditionally needed to build professional judgement. In a profession defined by judgement and interpretation, losing critical thinking means losing your competitive advantage.  

Over standardisation of Legal Advice
Excessive reliance on AI-driven drafting tools risks producing generic, less tailored work, weakening the firm’s differentiated expertise. 

Increased Exposure to Undetected Errors
AI tools, while efficient, can overlook nuances or misinterpret data—especially in complex, jurisdiction-specific matters—leading to undetected mistakes. 

AI should remain a tool, not a replacement for reasoning. Protecting the differentiating value of your firm should be a priority. 

2. Where AI Is Delivering Tangible Benefits

Used strategically, AI delivers clear, measurable results: 

  • Document Review (Due Diligence)
    Tools like Luminance and Kira Systems analyse contracts and documents, identifying key risks. 
  • Advanced Legal Research
    Platforms like Westlaw Precision and Lexis+ AI speed up jurisprudence searches. 
  • Drafting Contracts and Reports
    With Harvey AI, firms generate first drafts of contracts, reports, and summaries. 

A Thomson Reuters press release and its Future of Professionals Report clearly states: 

“Respondents predicted that AI has the potential to save them 12 hours per week within the next five years… For a U.S. lawyer, this could translate to an estimated $100,000 in additional billable time per lawyer annually 

3. How will the Business Model Shift in the next years?

AI isn’t just changing how lawyers work—it’s reshaping the law firm business model: 

  • Flatter Structures
    Automating junior tasks erodes traditional pyramidal structures. 
  • Growing Importance of Strategic Profiles
    Supervising AI and delivering strategic advice are becoming more valuable. 
  • From Billable Hours to Value-Based Billing
    Less time spent on routine tasks means firms must rethink pricing models and value propositions. 
  • Differentiation Through Judgement, Not Execution
    AI commoditises delivery. The true competitive edge will lie in human thinking and strategic insight. 

Tomorrow’s law firms won’t need technologists. They’ll need hybrid legal leaders. 

4. Strategic Recommendations for Law Firm Leaders

  • Audit AI Usage Internally
    Identify dependencies and opportunities across processes. 
  • Redesign Training and Mentoring
    Focus on strengthening critical thinking from early career stages. 
  • Use AI to Scale—Not Replace—Talent
    Let AI handle routine work so lawyers focus on advisory, leadership, and growth. 
  • Appoint a Legal Innovation Lead
    Ensure responsible, ethical, and strategic adoption of AI tools. 
  • Reinforce a Culture of Human Judgement
    Make clear: AI supports legal practice. Human thinking defines it. 

 Conclusion: AI Won’t Replace Lawyers—But It Could Replace Law Firms 

Technology adoption is inevitable. But firms that rely solely on automation will lose their strategic edge. The leaders of tomorrow will be those who combine AI efficiency with human critical thinking. 

To get in contact with our team click here.

law leaders working on new emerging areas for monetization

How Law Firms Build and Monetize Emerging Practice Areas

Innovation as a Structural Imperative The legal sector has entered a stage where innovation is no longer about adopting technology or improving efficiency. It has become structural: the ability of a firm to anticipate, frame, and institutionalize new legal fields now defines its competitiveness. Emerging topics such as Artificial Intelligence

Read More

El Futuro del Sector Legal en España con José María Alonso

En esta conversación, contamos con la participación de José María Alonso, destacado abogado especializado en litigación y arbitraje, con una trayectoria de más de 2000 procedimientos judiciales y más de 200 arbitrajes nacionales e internacionales. Ha ocupado cargos como decano del Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Madrid y socio director

Read More

Related posts

Executive Development and Assessment in Portugal for Senior talent

In Portugal, the market is relatively small, executive mobility is limited, and reputations travel quickly. Many companies already have solid senior leaders in place.It’s not about whether these leaders are competent. The question is how to assist them in improving performance as they take on greater roles.  Most people have an area that they can

Read More

The Insider Paradox: Why APAC Boards Are Choosing Continuity Over Disruption 

In H1 2025, 83% of all new CEOs in APAC were internal promotions the highest ratio ever recorded and dramatically higher than Western markets.  This surge is not accidental, nor is it a sign of risk-aversion. It reflects a deeper leadership strategy shaped by the geopolitical uncertainty of the region, operational complexity, and the rising value

Read More
china business landscape

Executive Search in China: Local Leadership vs Global Executives 

Over the past ten years, many multinational companies in China have quietly changed how they think about leadership. The model of relying primarily on expatriate executives is no longer taken for granted.   Boards and CEOs are increasingly weighing the trade-offs between local Chinese executives and global leaders sent from headquarters.

Read More

Executive Search in Mexico: Leadership Demand Shaped by Nearshoring 

Over the past few years, Mexico has moved to the center of many global expansion strategies. Nearshoring has accelerated investment decisions, operational scale, and organizational complexity across the country. As a result, leadership hiring has shifted from being opportunistic to becoming a critical risk factor.  In this environment, Executive Search in Mexico is

Read More

Executive Search in Portugal: Competing for Leadership in a Small Talent Market 

Portugal has become an increasingly attractive location for international businesses. While stability, talent quality, and quality of life are strong advantages, the senior talent pool is small, highly visible, and intensely competitive.   Because of this hiring in Portugal is about strategy. It involves managing scarcity, confidentiality, and long-term sustainability of

Read More